tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post7355372650300789560..comments2024-03-26T02:16:31.807+06:00Comments on Wangcha Sangey: Would India disrupt Bhutan China Border Negotiation?Wangcha Sangeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12825795727739573521noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-42571881860242018382016-05-15T13:37:42.036+06:002016-05-15T13:37:42.036+06:00well so many arrogant comments.One gentleman gave ...well so many arrogant comments.One gentleman gave us the whole list of the links that good prove india as aggressor.i believe they are the part of chinese pseudo intellectual brigade formed to give impetus to its propaganda. I wonder how the author and the one who commented dis not mention china's annexation of tibet? the author himeslf called china tibet? now i also know about indias stance towards tibet as they have already accepted it as a part of china but that does not change the truth about tibet. and to those who think that nothing on earth can stop china from taking what they want to take...well we have seen such arrogance before with japan germany and later russia america and now china. the chinese should never forget the location of the great chinese wall and should think it as their natural boundary.<br />rathorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05536360355722964338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-14419336519134424042014-12-04T18:12:53.658+06:002014-12-04T18:12:53.658+06:00I have been surfing online more than three hours t...I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I <br />never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty <br />worth enough for me. Personally, if all website owners and <br />bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever <br />before.<br /><br />my web blog: <a href="http://dudu.acoxi.com/index.php?do=/profile-2499/info/" rel="nofollow">подагра диета</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-51492918091805084312014-11-08T23:50:47.000+06:002014-11-08T23:50:47.000+06:001983 When India (Almost) Invaded Mauritius
http:/...1983 When India (Almost) Invaded Mauritius<br /><br />http://thediplomat.com/2013/03/when-india-almost-invaded-mauritius/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-60939810376936249442014-11-07T08:11:53.950+06:002014-11-07T08:11:53.950+06:00Dear Wangcha Sangey,
A good article.
It is unfai...Dear Wangcha Sangey,<br /><br />A good article.<br /><br />It is unfair on the part of India to play this game of brinkmanship. There is no power on this earth that can prevent China from taking over what is rightfully theirs. If they have been patient so far, it is because they understand that Bhutan is under pressure from India. Unfortunately India has always failed to see the forest being desecrated while their attention remained drawn to the lone tree that they believe is being imperiled. It is this inability to see and gauge the bigger picture that has caused India to lose respect and sympathy among all of its neighbors except Bhutan.<br /><br />Something important Bhutan must keep in mind: on the standoff on the border issue, China understands that Bhutan is under compulsion from India. But will the mighty Dragon understand, and be patient, if they suspect that Bhutan is collaborating with India in something that is seen to be antagonistic against its interests? Bhutan must desist in such activities at all costs. Let us not give China the excuse they need.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-3089629761804194342014-11-07T00:55:10.807+06:002014-11-07T00:55:10.807+06:00Contrary to popular belief, China has a very good ...Contrary to popular belief, China has a very good record in border settling. China has fourteen contiguous land borders and has settled amicably twelve of them with the exception of India and Bhutan. As is explained by this article, India has an overwhelming influence in Bhutan's foreign policy and India does not want Bhutan and China to have its border settled. This comprehensive study in China's border settlements conducted by a political scientist in MIT is very informative.<br /><br /><a href="http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8782.html" rel="nofollow">http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8782.html </a><br /><br />India on the other hand has border disputes with every single of its neighbors. Some of it extremely contentious and bitter. The following is a list of India's foreign adventures vis-à-vis its neighbors.<br /><br />1947 Annexation of Kashmir<br /><br />1949 Annexation of Manipur<br /><a href="http://www.tehelka.com/manipurs-merger-with-india-was-a-forced-annexation/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tehelka.com/manipurs-merger-with-india-was-a-forced-annexation/</a><br /><br />1949 Annexation of Tripura<br /><a href="http://www.crescent-online.net/2009/09/the-myths-of-one-nation-and-one-hinduism-in-india-zawahir-siddique-2316-articles.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.crescent-online.net/2009/09/the-myths-of-one-nation-and-one-hinduism-in-india-zawahir-siddique-2316-articles.html</a><br /><br />1951 Annexation of South Tibet:<br /><a href="http://kanglaonline.com/2011/06/khathing-the-taking-of-tawang/" rel="nofollow">http://kanglaonline.com/2011/06/khathing-the-taking-of-tawang/ </a><br /><br />1961 Annexation of Goa:<br /><a href="http://goa-invasion-1961.blogspot.in/2013/09/india-pirated-goa-china-is-regaining_16.html" rel="nofollow">http://goa-invasion-1961.blogspot.in/2013/09/india-pirated-goa-china-is-regaining_16.html </a><br /><br />1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal:<br /><a href="http://www.eurasiareview.com/07032012-indian-hegemony-in-nepal-oped/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurasiareview.com/07032012-indian-hegemony-in-nepal-oped/ </a><br /><br />1962 Aggression against China:<br /><a href="http://gregoryclark.net/redif.html" rel="nofollow">http://gregoryclark.net/redif.html </a><br /><a href="http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/news-events/podcasts/renewed-tension-indiachina-border-whos-blame" rel="nofollow">http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/news-events/podcasts/renewed-tension-indiachina-border-whos-blame </a><br /><br />1971 Annexation of Turtuk, Pakistan:<br /><a href="http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/suddenly-indian" rel="nofollow">http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/suddenly-indian </a><br /><br />1972 Annexation of Tin Bigha, Bangladesh<br /><a href="http://www.dhakatribune.com/op-ed/2014/feb/20/killing-fields" rel="nofollow">http://www.dhakatribune.com/op-ed/2014/feb/20/killing-fields</a><br /><br />1975 Annexation of Sikkim:<br /><a href="http://nepalitimes.com/issue/35/Nation/9621#.UohjPHQo6LA" rel="nofollow">http://nepalitimes.com/issue/35/Nation/9621#.UohjPHQo6LA </a><br /><br />1990 (Failed) Attempted annexation of Bhutan:<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/world/india-based-groups-seek-to-disrupt-bhutan.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/world/india-based-groups-seek-to-disrupt-bhutan.html </a><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-80137158984862190852014-11-03T08:52:24.863+06:002014-11-03T08:52:24.863+06:00I do not think that there was ever any thought on ...I do not think that there was ever any thought on part of Bhutan to give away what is her land at the Tri-Junction. On the other hand it is India asking Bhutan to demand Chinese land at Doklam. <br />In the north in Haa and Bumthang China had consented to accede to Bhutanese requests and for geographical factor,the two sides had agreed to adjust the sizes of area in northern Haa and Bumthang without altering the total land area claimed by Bhutan. This was a national News several years back and put to the highest Legislative Body. And this arrangement has no relation to the position at Doklam. At Doklam India is using Bhutan to irritate China since India also borders China there and the two Countries are yet to resolve their border issue. And any possible extension of Bhutanese territory there would automatically be to the advantage of Indian strategic position because India has strong presence in Bhitan and the Bhutanese Army is funded by India though thankfully our King is the Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces. It is unthinkable for Bhutan to compromise the interest of India and at the same time it is impossible for Bhutan to get even a square inch of Indian or Chinese land at the Tri-Junction area. And Bhutan cannot give her land or agree to any kind of adjustment with China or even with India because we stand in imminent threat from both the giant Nations since it is extremely sensitive area. To India the chicken neck spells danger for its north eastern frontier States and to China this chicken neck poses the danger of Indian Army taking over Southern Bhutan and therefore halving the Buffer State Bhutan with whom she does not as yet have any diplomatic or commerce relations.Wangcha Sangeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12825795727739573521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5685253048119474681.post-27555779664192697282014-11-02T21:46:09.318+06:002014-11-02T21:46:09.318+06:00I have always been intrigued by the border problem...I have always been intrigued by the border problems with the north and gone through number of articles published in Eurasia views. Your post, is very much informative as always and I have enjoyed reading through. You have the beautiful insight over the solution, It would be very good for Bhutan if the two neighbors accord it to our whims. <br /><br />One thing I'd like further clarification is the exchange of land proposed by China, or was it really Bhutanese part of the delegation that bargained for more land in the Chicken Neck Area? The previous articles I have read all claimed that China wanted the 360 sq. Km disputed land in Haa, Doklam in exchange for the 400 sq. Km disputed area in Pasamlung, Lhuntse. This was clearly not in interest of India because if Bhutan turns this area over to the China, the chances are China may establish army camp in the Chicken neck Area which is strategic because if Chinese army are in the tri junction Chicken neck area; it also mean that Chinese army can cut of the Sikkim, and other northern states of India possibly Jammu and Kashmir inclusive. <br /><br />One thing is clear, nothing comes out of the border talks. Was is supposedly done Bhutanese counterparts who didn't wish to give away what India didn't want to be given. Or does India see the threat to all it's northern states and Bhutan itself, if Bhutan gives away the tri area in Doklam? Please clarify more. <br /><br />Thank youTshewang Gyeltshenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11317575438879458689noreply@blogger.com