Monday, June 10, 2013

The Political Storm that threatens the Democratic Dignity of Bhutan.

Today the Bhutanese Media confirmed that the highest echelon of Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa Political Party ( DNT ) are now part of People’s Democratic Party ( PDP ). The highest echelon includes the President, the Vice President, a prominent original promoter of DNT and another DNT winner. And four other DNT candidates are piggybacked to the four sought after Candidates to strengthen DNT’s hand within the Party Alliance with PDP.

Impact of the Party Alliance.

1)  This reduces the original DNT to the same status as Druk Chirwang Tshogpa ( DCT ) Political Party or even worse because without its high command DNT is reduced into a nonexistent Entity. The face of the Party has been taken away and the major part of the 17.5% primary votes goes with the Candidates who have switched over.

2)   This merger of 8 DNT Candidates with the PDP cannot be termed as Party Hopping or Opportunistic leap of registered Party members from one Political Party to another as permitted under Election Laws. The Election Law refers specifically to members of a registered Political Party. It does not refer to Constituency Candidates of a Political Party who are nominated, accepted and registered with the Election Commission of Bhutan ( ECB ) as Party Candidates.


3)   The complete switching over of Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa’s high command along with 5 other Candidates to the People’s Democratic Party definitely constitutes the formation of Political Parties Alliance. It is way beyond what the Election Law states i.e. resigning of registered members from one Political Party to join another Political Party and contest the General Elections.

4)    The formation of Political Party Alliance to contest the General Election poses a historic challenge to the Election Commission of Bhutan, the Institution of Judiciary in Bhutan and the Institution of Bhutanese Monarchy. As independent as the Election Commission of Bhutan is supposed to be, yet, it alone may not be able to give the approval or disapproval stamp to this emergence of Political Parties Alliance.


5)   When a Political Party receives around 18% of votes in the Primary Election, it represents nearly one-fifth of the Bhutanese population. How do we throttle the voice of 1/5th of the Nation? This is something more Bhutanese should have dwelt upon prior to the adoption of the Constitution.

6)   At the time of drafting the Constitution of Bhutan, I did point out in writing this dilemma if only 2 Political Parties are permitted to contest in the General Election. And now this dilemma is haunting Bhutan immediately after the 1st Primary Election held in the nation. In the year 2007 itself, I felt that the nation had a moral, social and political obligation to take into account any Political Party that receives over 15% of votes in the Primary Election and that was why I had appealed to the Chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee that more than two Political Parties need to be considered for General Election. However, national wisdom stuck to 2 Political Parties and the Draft Constitution has been signed into Mother of Law by the first Parliament. And I don’t think it leaves any room for Political Alliance under whatever Shade and Colour. And if Election Commission chooses to interpret Election Law to suit political convenience than I think it would be less painful for the nation to terminate the tenure of Election Commissioners then have the process of Democracy murdered.

7)   As of this date, it would be unconstitutional for 3 Political Parties to participate in the present General Election. The Political Alliance of Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa and People’s Democratic Party under the banner of People’s Democratic Party is unconstitutional. The Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa has already publicly declared that their candidates even after joining another Political Party are expected to, “take DNT’s principles and concerns forward.”

8)     It is too late this time but this coming 2nd Parliament must amend the Constitution.

a)    Make provision for a 3rd Political Party to contest General Election. The result of the 1st Primary Election is sufficiently evident enough to substantiate the need for a 3rd Political Party in the General Election. It will also take care of domination of Bhutanese political scene by just one national Party.
b)   Otherwise do away with the nomination process of Political Party Candidates for the Primary Round of Election. Keep the Primary Election purely between POLITICAL PARTIES as it was meant to be and not between Political Party Constituency Candidates as has been encouraged by Election Commission.

9)  The Election Commission of Bhutan should never have over stepped its mandate. Why were the Political Parties required to identify and nominate 47 Candidates for 47 Constituencies when Primary Election was primarily for selection of two Political Parties to contest in the General Election from amongst numerous Political Parties? Even the BBS debate forum sponsored by ECB had pitched constituency candidates against each other. For Primary Election, one would have thought that 3 public debates would have been more than adequate: 1) Between Presidents of Political Parties, 2) Between Vice Presidents of Political Parties and 3) Between General Secretaries of Political Parties.

10) Things misfire and bring embarrassment to all because politics of convenience has been given a free rein. Is it now possible to clear this political mess and recoup democratic dignity? I think Bhutan and Bhutanese and our relevant authorities must think deeply.

11) Whatever we decide, please do not lay grounds for distrusts, shameful partiality and national discord. The people who make rules cannot keep bending the same continuously without harming the unity and stability of the Nation. It is time that we share the onus of responsible interpretation of Election Laws that ensures transparency into the process of Democracy. Democratic Reforms were introduced to avoid any future Public Discontent as so demonstrated in late 1980s in the Southern Region of the Nation. It is necessary now to look beyond the short-term political gain for any political faction. Bhutan and Bhutanese must avoid sowing seeds of public disillusionment that in the long run could adversely affect the social and political thought process of the populace. 

I personally do not think that the ongoing Political Alliance would actually make a big difference in the outcome of the General Election.  First PDP may suffer similar backlash as Druk Phuensum Tshogpa ( DPT ) suffered in Punakha and Haa for booting out old Candidates. And secondly the voters of DNT may have sincerely voted for New Times New Ideas and not Old Wine in Old Casket. If this presumption is true then voters especially those postal voters and other educated voters would have no further reasons to vote for the same Candidates. I also do not think PDP would have wanted as many as 8 DNT Candidates but maybe that was the only way to strike an Alliance deal with DNT. It would not have been possible especially for someone like Aum Dorji Choden the President of DNT to serve under a banner of another Political Party without substantial number of her own Party Candidates joining her. It would have been like a mother abandoning her infant baby to be in stride with her new Lover.


8 comments:

  1. While I doubt the wisdom of the merger, in my opinion your interpretation of the Election Act is wrong, as section 209 does allow the merger. You have said that the Act only allows for registered members to become candidates for another party, but that constiutency candidates may not go over to another party. However, i respectfully disagree, constitutency candidates are also registered members, so section 209 specifically allows for all registered members to go over to another party.
    Interpreting this section as excluding constitueny candidates makes no sense, because this provision is meaningless otherwise.
    A party would be recruiting a member of another political party after the general rounds, only if that member was a constitutency candidate,who performed well in the general rounds, and not some random party member who was not a constituency candidate at all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sangay Of Haa Wangtsha,

    If the people elected Candidate cant nominate them in the parliament due to their party's failure in primary round will people of those constituencies feel happy. Is there any reason for making people to vote for capable and deserving candidate.

    For Example you are nominated by Haaps from Bji-Kartsgog-Esu Constituency and you have secured majority vote from your constituency but you Party failed to go for General Round till then the majority of your constituency voters wants to have you from your constituency what will be your reaction. In Democracy as per my understanding people elect their leaders through voting to form the government and opposition if we cant represent even after wining highest no of votes from our constituency the very name of Democracy is forbidden by the Law.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very True La Dorji Gyeltshen

    ReplyDelete
  4. I for sure voted for new ideas for new times, but i did not know that our mother dorji choden would elope with her bf to get a share of wangtshey frm the old cask. I feel so cheated that even the propounders of new ideas for new times let the horse eat up the peach blossoms and still praise it. As it turned out to be, there are no new ideas, only new times. Who knows our mother DC may have inadvertently opted for a political harakiri in addition to digging the grave for DNT. She will definately go down in history as the first ever party president to forsake her own party for another one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 'The Election Law refers specifically to members of a registered Political Party. It does not refer to Constituency Candidates of a Political Party who are nominated, accepted and registered with the Election Commission of Bhutan ( ECB ) as Party Candidates.' interprets Wancha Sangay. So Sangay you mean to say that those party candidates are not registered members. I think it would be wise of you not to split hair and create confusion here. You may have your reason of not being happy with DNT candidates going to PDP but calling for termination of CEC based on false interpretation is anything but a voice of concerned citizen for his country. I can now very well understand that why the drafting committee did not heed to your submission.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This blog is really intellectually enriching with insightful debate and constructive arguments.It is not like other shitty blogs.

    ReplyDelete